Lilian Marmousez vs Mika Lipp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Aug at 06:22 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Marmousez vs M. Lipp

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Marmousez 1 - 0 Lipp
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lilian Marmousez winning 2 and Mika Lipp winning 0. The last match between Lilian Marmousez and Mika Lipp was at the M15 Frankfurt, 06-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Lilian Marmousez getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marmousez | 1 |
| Lipp | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Frankfurt(08-06-25)
L. Marmousez vs M. Lipp H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.64% (182-104) | Career Total W/L | 52.27% (69-63) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Marmousez vs M. Lipp Match Preview:
- Marmousez is slightly stronger in second serve performance, winning 43.17% of points compared to Lipp's 40.2%. Could this edge prove crucial in the match?
- For return game performance, Lipp has an advantage, winning 51.15% of opponent's second serve points, whereas Marmousez wins 42%.
- In handling first serve returns, Lipp leads with 34.78% compared to Marmousez's 26.88%. Does this give Lipp an upper hand?
- Marmousez excels under pressure, saving 53.27% of breakpoints, slightly better than Lipp's 50.5%.
- Overall, Marmousez has a better match win record over the past year at 72.88%, while Lipp stands at 53.19%.
- Both players have their best performance on clay, but Marmousez holds a higher win rate of 66% in comparison to Lipp's 53%.
- Marmousez has faced tougher opponents with an average ranking of 191.64 versus Lipp's 265.17.
- In deciding sets, Marmousez shows significant strength, winning 73%, as opposed to Lipp's 38%.
- Marmousez's breakpoint conversion rate is 26.11%, which is lower than Lipp's 40.8%. Could Lipp capitalize on this differential?
Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the various performance metrics, both players exhibit distinct strengths. Marmousez shows greater overall match success and performs particularly well under pressure in deciding sets, making them a robust competitor. Lipp, on the other hand, has a notable advantage in return games and break-point conversion, which could tilt some key moments in their favor.
Marmousez's ability to withstand breakpoints and their higher historical performance in matches against stronger competition suggest resilience and adaptability on court.
While Lipp's superior return ability is commendable, Marmousez's comprehensive performance edge across various gameplay areas suggests they are more likely to emerge victorious in this match.
Lilian Marmousez vs Mika Lipp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Marmousez vs M. Lipp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:31:17 | Average Match Time | 1:31:17 |
| 63% (29/46) | 1st Serve % | 55% (34/62) |
| 83% (24/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (17/34) |
| 53% (9/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (15/28) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 48% (30/62) | Return Points Win % | 28% (13/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Marmousez Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(6) 4-6 7-5 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 7-6(5) | ||
M. Lipp Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 7-6(0) 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 3-6 6-4 10-6 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||

L. Marmousez vs M. Lipp Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.64% (182/104) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.27% (69/63) |
| 63.02% (397/233) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.86% (157/140) |
| 55.39% (3164/2548) | Games Win/Loss | 51.66% (1449/1356) |
| 63.16% (48/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 67.58% (123/59) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.10% (60/53) |
| 39.29% (11/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 821 | Aces Total | 72 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 581 | Total Double Faults | 231 |
| 1:31:19 | Average Match Time | 1:1:23 |
| 452.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 279.09 |
| 59% (9719/16475) | 1st Serve % | 66% (3438/5219) |
| 69% (6707/9719) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (2053/3438) |
| 53% (3559/6756) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (843/1781) |
| 44% (873/1974) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (255/559) |
| 43% (7307/17174) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2183/5153) |
| 53.33% (16/14) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 64.84% (166/90) | Futures W/L | 52.67% (69/62) |
| 67% (179/269) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (69/131) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 59% (35/59) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (8/18) |
| 54% (37/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (14/32) |
| 87% (181/157) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (65/60) |
| 12% (181/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (65/5) |
| 24% (103/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (67/9) |